<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NLPhilia Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nlphilia.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nlphilia.net</link>
	<description>NLP Articles, News, Trainings, and Products</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 03:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>We didn&#8217;t need self-actualization after all</title>
		<link>http://nlphilia.net/2010/08/23/didnt-need-self-actualization/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://nlphilia.net/2010/08/23/didnt-need-self-actualization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 03:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael DeBusk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Psych]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Values]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nlphilia.net/?p=483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those of us with a fascination for the &#8220;P&#8221; in &#8220;NLP&#8221; may be delighted to learn that Maslow’s Pyramid of Needs has been updated to reflect the past 50-ish years of research. The research team – which included Vladas Griskevicius of the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, and Mark Schaller of the University of British Columbia, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nlphilia.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/maslow_pyramid_needs.jpg#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed"><img src="http://nlphilia.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/maslow_pyramid_needs-185x300.jpg" alt="Maslow&#039;s pyramid of needs, old version and new" title="maslow_pyramid_needs" width="185" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-485" /></a></p>
<p>Those of us with a fascination for the &#8220;P&#8221; in &#8220;NLP&#8221; may be delighted to learn that <a href='http://psychcentral.com/news/2010/08/23/updated-maslows-pyramid-of-needs/17144.html'>Maslow’s Pyramid of Needs has been updated</a> to reflect the past 50-ish years of research.</p>
<blockquote><p>The research team – which included Vladas Griskevicius of the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, and Mark Schaller of the University of British Columbia, Vancouver – restructured the famous pyramid after observing how psychological processes radically change in response to evolutionarily fundamental motives, such as self-protection, mating or status concerns.</p>
<p>The bottom four levels of the new pyramid are highly compatible with Maslow’s, but big changes are at the top. Perhaps the most controversial modification is that self-actualization no longer appears on the pyramid at all.</p></blockquote>
<p>What do you think? Will you stop striving for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-actualization">self-actualization</a> just because a group of psychologists says you no longer need it? Does the new pyramid make more sense?</p>
<p><a href="http://nlphilia.net/2010/08/23/didnt-need-self-actualization/" rel="bookmark">We didn&#8217;t need self-actualization after all</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://nlphilia.net">NLPhilia Blog</a> on 2010-08-23 (Monday).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nlphilia.net/2010/08/23/didnt-need-self-actualization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Useful Grammar and Punctuation Points</title>
		<link>http://nlphilia.net/2010/07/10/useful-grammar-and-punctuation-points/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://nlphilia.net/2010/07/10/useful-grammar-and-punctuation-points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 00:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael DeBusk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linguistic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nlphilia.net/?p=472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In another installment of &#8220;Let&#8217;s Help Others To Take Seriously What We Write,&#8221; I&#8217;d like to offer a link to Solveig Haugland&#8217;s &#8220;OpenOffice.org Training, Tips, and Ideas&#8221; blog: The key thing about many of these items, and useful grammar and punctuation in general, is they&#8217;re not just fancy-schmancy rules. They are important rules that affect [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In another installment of &#8220;Let&#8217;s Help Others To Take Seriously What We Write,&#8221; I&#8217;d like to offer a link to Solveig Haugland&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://openoffice.blogs.com/">OpenOffice.org Training, Tips, and Ideas</a>&#8221; blog:</p>
<blockquote><p>The key thing about many of these items, and useful grammar and punctuation in general, is they&#8217;re not just fancy-schmancy rules. They are important rules that affect the meaning of what you say.  I think most people would agree is an important component of communication&#8211;controlling the meaning of what you&#8217;re writing.</p>
<p>Some of them don&#8217;t affect meaning, but do make it easier and more pleasant for your readers. That means they&#8217;re more likely to read your email, spec, or marketing blurb, and thus get the information you&#8217;re trying to convey.</p></blockquote>
<p>Here are the high points. She goes on to explain them (and beautifully, I might add) in the body of the article.</p>
<ol>
<li>Use the word <em>that</em> is correct (the correct word, <em>which</em> helps your readers understand you, is always a good choice)</li>
<li>Wherever possible without sounding dorky, put <em>only</em> in front of the thing it applies to.</li>
<li>Keep your intransitive verbs off my body</li>
<li><em>Lay off</em> using <em>lie</em> incorrectly</li>
<li>Dangling participles are as bad as you&#8217;ve heard.</li>
<li>Few and less and more (but is less more?)</li>
<li>Remember the comma.</li>
<li>Cut down on the parenthetical phrases</li>
<li>Forget you ever encountered ellipsis&#8230;.unless you&#8217;re quoting a movie review&#8230;and leaving out the&#8230;bad parts&#8230;</li>
<li>Hyphenation is important.</li>
</ol>
<p>(For what it&#8217;s worth, I disagree with her about the serial comma. I think it&#8217;s important to use it. There are times when it matters a great deal for sake of clarity, and in those times when it doesn&#8217;t matter, it does no harm. Good habits are <em>good</em> habits.)</p>
<p>Go read &#8212; and learn well! &#8212; the rest: <a href="http://openoffice.blogs.com/openoffice/2010/07/top-ten-useful-grammar-and-punctuation-points-i-learned-as-a-techwriter-and-in-life-in-general-and-t.html">Top Ten Useful Grammar and Punctuation Points I Learned as a Techwriter and in Life in General (and Three to Ignore)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://nlphilia.net/2010/07/10/useful-grammar-and-punctuation-points/" rel="bookmark">Useful Grammar and Punctuation Points</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://nlphilia.net">NLPhilia Blog</a> on 2010-07-10 (Saturday).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nlphilia.net/2010/07/10/useful-grammar-and-punctuation-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shrinking Pain</title>
		<link>http://nlphilia.net/2010/07/10/shrinking-pain/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://nlphilia.net/2010/07/10/shrinking-pain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 23:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael DeBusk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neuro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psych]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nlphilia.net/?p=468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet another &#8220;NLP was here first&#8221; example. I saw this on a trivia buff&#8217;s blog, &#8220;Futility Closet:&#8221; In 2008, researchers at Oxford University found that subjects could reduce pain and swelling in an injured hand by viewing it through reversed binoculars. Conversely, a magnified injury was more painful. &#8220;If it looks bigger, it looks sorer,&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another &#8220;NLP was here first&#8221; example. I saw this on a trivia buff&#8217;s blog, &#8220;<a href="http://www.futilitycloset.com/2010/07/10/far-be-it/">Futility Closet</a>:&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>In 2008, researchers at Oxford University found that subjects could reduce pain and swelling in an injured hand by viewing it through reversed binoculars.</p>
<p>Conversely, a magnified injury was more painful. &#8220;If it looks bigger, it looks sorer,&#8221; said physiologist G. Lorimer Moseley. &#8220;Therefore the brain acts to protect it.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>A judicious Googling led me to <a href="http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(08)01259-1">the pertinent issue of <cite>Current Biology</cite></a> online. On the right-hand side of that page, there are links to PDF and HTML versions of the article.</p>
<p><a href="http://nlphilia.net/2010/07/10/shrinking-pain/" rel="bookmark">Shrinking Pain</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://nlphilia.net">NLPhilia Blog</a> on 2010-07-10 (Saturday).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nlphilia.net/2010/07/10/shrinking-pain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Therapist Competence Matters</title>
		<link>http://nlphilia.net/2010/07/07/therapist-competence-matters/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://nlphilia.net/2010/07/07/therapist-competence-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 20:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael DeBusk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psych]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nlphilia.net/?p=465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have yet another &#8220;NLP said it first&#8221; moment in an article in a recent issue of the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology: A new study underscores the benefit of receiving cognitive behavioral therapy CBT from a competent therapist who follows the guidelines for delivering CBT. Prior studies have shown that while cognitive therapy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have yet another &#8220;NLP said it first&#8221; moment in an article in a recent issue of the <cite>Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology</cite>:</p>
<blockquote><p>A new study underscores the benefit of receiving cognitive behavioral therapy CBT from a competent therapist who follows the guidelines for delivering CBT.</p>
<p>Prior studies have shown that while cognitive therapy is an effective treatment for depression, a clear understanding of the role therapists’ training and expertise plays in making treatment successful was unknown.</p>
<p>The new study suggests therapist competence may be a particularly important determinant of outcome for some patients.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard this from my trainers from my first training with Richard in 1997. How is it that Psychology takes so long to catch up to NLP?</p>
<p>Go read the rest at <a href='http://psychcentral.com/news/2010/07/07/therapist-competency-important-for-treatment-success/15377.html'>Therapist Competency Important for Treatment Success</a> on <a href="http://psychcentral.com/">Psych Central</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://nlphilia.net/2010/07/07/therapist-competence-matters/" rel="bookmark">Therapist Competence Matters</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://nlphilia.net">NLPhilia Blog</a> on 2010-07-7 (Wednesday).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nlphilia.net/2010/07/07/therapist-competence-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Behold&#8230; The World&#8217;s Funniest Typo!</title>
		<link>http://nlphilia.net/2010/07/07/behold-the-worlds-funniest-typo/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://nlphilia.net/2010/07/07/behold-the-worlds-funniest-typo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 09:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael DeBusk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Left Field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linguistic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nlphilia.net/?p=463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I challenge you to find a funnier typographical error than this one (follow the link): That IS a strong winter storm..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I challenge you to find a funnier typographical error than this one (follow the link):</p>
<blockquote><p><a href='http://criggo.com/2010/07/06/that-is-a-strong-winter-storm/'>That IS a strong winter storm.</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://nlphilia.net/2010/07/07/behold-the-worlds-funniest-typo/" rel="bookmark">Behold&#8230; The World&#8217;s Funniest Typo!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://nlphilia.net">NLPhilia Blog</a> on 2010-07-7 (Wednesday).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nlphilia.net/2010/07/07/behold-the-worlds-funniest-typo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Implicit Modeling? Watch out for this.</title>
		<link>http://nlphilia.net/2010/07/04/implicit-modeling-watch-out-for-this/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://nlphilia.net/2010/07/04/implicit-modeling-watch-out-for-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 02:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael DeBusk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psych]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nlphilia.net/?p=459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a bit of a money geek. Not too crazy, but I like to keep an eye on what I have. So I read a couple of personal finance blogs. Recently, Monevator had an article titled, &#8220;Keep It Simple, Stupid,&#8221; and it pointed me to an interesting group of articles of interest to implicit modelers: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit of a money geek. Not too crazy, but I like to keep an eye on what I have. So I read a couple of personal finance blogs. Recently, <a href="http://monevator.com/">Monevator</a> had an article titled, &#8220;<a href="http://monevator.com/2010/07/01/keep-it-simple-stupid/">Keep It Simple, Stupid</a>,&#8221; and it pointed me to an interesting group of articles of interest to implicit modelers:</p>
<blockquote><p>Appearing this week in the <cite>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</cite>, the mystery of overimitation has been a long-standing one in developmental psychology. How is it that young children, who are able to learn and reason in so many impressively agile ways, can be utterly stumped by something as simple as the transparent Puzzle Box shown above? Specifically, when kids see an adult getting a prize out of that box in a way that adults &#8212; and even chimpanzees &#8212; can easily identify as clumsy and inefficient, they seem to lose the ability to figure out how to open the box &#8220;correctly&#8221;. Watching an adult doing it wrong, in other words, effectively blocks children from figuring out how to do it right. Children become stuck <em>overimitating</em> &#8212; or copying the adult’s wasteful strategy, even when doing so leads to bad outcomes.</p></blockquote>
<p>We humans are too smart for our own good, and make things harder than they need to be. There&#8217;s nothing particularly revolutionary in discovering that. But I hadn&#8217;t heard of &#8220;overimitating&#8221; before. I&#8217;d heard that implicit modeling is the way we all do it from birth; it&#8217;s the way babies learn practically everything. At the same time, we forget how long it takes for babies to get it right. We don&#8217;t want to take seven to eight years to, say, learn a language&#8230; we want to hold a coherent conversation in a few weeks.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s important, then, when we model by imitation, to remember to take the model apart and find out what needs to be there and what doesn&#8217;t. We don&#8217;t want to have to tap stuff with a feather just because that&#8217;s how we learned to do it.</p>
<p>Read it all at <a href="http://www.hellofelix.com/childhood-social-learning/overimitation/the-mystery-of-overimitation.html">The Mystery of Overimitation</a> over at <a href="http://www.hellofelix.com/">Hello Felix</a>, a childhood development blog for parents.</p>
<p><a href="http://nlphilia.net/2010/07/04/implicit-modeling-watch-out-for-this/" rel="bookmark">Implicit Modeling? Watch out for this.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://nlphilia.net">NLPhilia Blog</a> on 2010-07-4 (Sunday).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nlphilia.net/2010/07/04/implicit-modeling-watch-out-for-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharpening Observation</title>
		<link>http://nlphilia.net/2010/03/27/sharpening-observation/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://nlphilia.net/2010/03/27/sharpening-observation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael DeBusk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Calibration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nlphilia.net/?p=455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the October 2009 issue of Smithsonian Magazine, there&#8217;s an article on Amy Herman, an art historian and lawyer, who uses fine art to teach the fine art of observation: A Caravaggio appeared on the screen. In it, five men in 17th-century dress are seated around a table. Two others stand nearby, and one of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the October 2009 issue of <cite>Smithsonian Magazine</cite>, there&#8217;s an article on Amy Herman, an art historian and lawyer, who uses fine art to teach the fine art of observation:</p>
<blockquote><p>A Caravaggio appeared on the screen. In it, five men in 17th-century dress are seated around a table. Two others stand nearby, and one of them, barely discernible in shadow, points a finger &#8212; accusingly? &#8212; at a young man at the table with some coins.</p>
<p>Among the officers a discussion arose about who robbed whom, but they soon learned there could be no verdict. No one was being accused or arrested, Herman said. The painting was The Calling of St. Matthew, and the man in the shadow was Jesus Christ. The cops fell silent.</p>
<p>Later, Deputy Inspector Donna Allen said, &#8220;I can see where this would be useful in sizing up the big picture.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Some of the comments on the Web version of the article are interesting, too. One of them mentions <a href="http://www.sherlockian.net/canon/index.html">the Sherlock Holmes stories</a>. Another mentions a program called <a href="http://www.vtshome.org/">Visual Thinking Strategies</a>, something I hadn&#8217;t heard of before.</p>
<p>If I ever have the opportunity to take Ms. Herman&#8217;s training, I think I&#8217;ll do it. What about you?</p>
<p>Go read <a href="http://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/Teaching-Cops-to-See.html">Teaching Cops to See</a>, from Smithsonian Magazine</p>
<p><a href="http://nlphilia.net/2010/03/27/sharpening-observation/" rel="bookmark">Sharpening Observation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://nlphilia.net">NLPhilia Blog</a> on 2010-03-27 (Saturday).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nlphilia.net/2010/03/27/sharpening-observation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thinking Critically</title>
		<link>http://nlphilia.net/2010/03/20/thinking-critically/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://nlphilia.net/2010/03/20/thinking-critically/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael DeBusk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thinking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nlphilia.net/?p=452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a great little blog called &#8220;It Made My Day.&#8221; Whenever something really cool happens to you, you can go there and post about it&#8230; and, even better, you can read those of others. Reading it makes my day. Today, some guy called Richie posted one that got me to thinking. Which, naturally, made my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a great little blog called &#8220;<a href="http://itmademyday.com/">It Made My Day</a>.&#8221; Whenever something really cool happens to you, you can go there and post about it&#8230; and, even better, you can read those of others. Reading it makes my day.</p>
<p>Today, some guy called <a href="http://itmademyday.com/2010/03/19/richies-little-moment-of-win/">Richie posted one</a> that got me to thinking. Which, naturally, made my day. He said,</p>
<blockquote><p>In my Geography 101 class, my professor said: <q>If I didn’t understand the concept of wind, I would think the trees were dancing!</q></p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s some serious philosophy there. It takes the whole problem of superstition, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_thinking">Magical Thinking</a>, and so on and condenses it to bite size. I absolutely love it.</p>
<p><a href="http://nlphilia.net/2010/03/20/thinking-critically/" rel="bookmark">Thinking Critically</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://nlphilia.net">NLPhilia Blog</a> on 2010-03-20 (Saturday).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nlphilia.net/2010/03/20/thinking-critically/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You can&#8217;t do what?</title>
		<link>http://nlphilia.net/2010/03/16/you-cant-do-what/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://nlphilia.net/2010/03/16/you-cant-do-what/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael DeBusk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Left Field]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nlphilia.net/?p=447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love this guy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I love this guy.</strong></p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7Hz8gQlkiFA&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en_US&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7Hz8gQlkiFA&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en_US&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://nlphilia.net/2010/03/16/you-cant-do-what/" rel="bookmark">You can&#8217;t do what?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://nlphilia.net">NLPhilia Blog</a> on 2010-03-16 (Tuesday).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nlphilia.net/2010/03/16/you-cant-do-what/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How we distort time</title>
		<link>http://nlphilia.net/2010/03/16/how-we-distort-time/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://nlphilia.net/2010/03/16/how-we-distort-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael DeBusk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nlphilia.net/?p=441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a follow-up to my last post, Threats and the Perception of Time, here&#8217;s a recent article from Psychology Today: &#8230;fear does not actually speed up our rate of perception or mental processing. Instead, it allows us to remember what we do experience in greater detail. Since our perception of time is based on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a follow-up to my last post, <a href="http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/31/threats-and-the-perception-of-time/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">Threats and the Perception of Time</a>, here&#8217;s a recent article from Psychology Today:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;fear does not actually speed up our rate of perception or mental processing. Instead, it allows us to remember what we do experience in greater detail. Since our perception of time is based on the number of things we remember, fearful experiences thus seem to unfold more slowly.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the rest at <a href='http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/extreme-fear/201003/how-the-brain-stops-time'>How the Brain Stops Time</a> at Psychology Today. Interesting stuff.</p>
<p><a href="http://nlphilia.net/2010/03/16/how-we-distort-time/" rel="bookmark">How we distort time</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://nlphilia.net">NLPhilia Blog</a> on 2010-03-16 (Tuesday).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nlphilia.net/2010/03/16/how-we-distort-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Threats and the Perception of Time</title>
		<link>http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/31/threats-and-the-perception-of-time/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/31/threats-and-the-perception-of-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael DeBusk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nlphilia.net/?p=437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A co-worker and I the other day were discussing how to get hit by a train. (Never mind how we got on the subject. Conversations in hospitals can take strange turns.) I brought up something that a guy I used to know &#8212; he worked for Amtrak, and still does, I think &#8212; told me: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A co-worker and I the other day were discussing how to get hit by a train. (Never mind how we got on the subject. Conversations in hospitals can take strange turns.) I brought up something that a guy I used to know &#8212; he worked for Amtrak, and still does, I think &#8212; told me: you can&#8217;t tell how fast a train is coming at you if you&#8217;re standing in front of it. People on a track see a train coming, they think they have lots of time, but they don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Then I read this article, which fleshes out the brain&#8217;s perception of time in threatening situations:</p>
<blockquote><p>Finally, the effect might be due to the intrinsic dynamic properties of the stimulus, such that the brain estimates time based on the number of changes in an event. </p>
<p>Of particular relevance to the third hypothesis is the observation that looming stimuli are associated with a distorted subjective perception of time, such that their duration is perceived to be longer than it actually is. Marc Wittmann and his colleagues exploited this in their new study. They recruited 20 participants&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>For more information on how to work with someone&#8217;s perception of time, go read <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/neurophilosophy/2010/01/is_time_dilated_during_a_threatening_situation.php">Does time dilate during a threatening situation?</a></p>
<p><a href="http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/31/threats-and-the-perception-of-time/" rel="bookmark">Threats and the Perception of Time</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://nlphilia.net">NLPhilia Blog</a> on 2010-01-31 (Sunday).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/31/threats-and-the-perception-of-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spot the Polarity Responder</title>
		<link>http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/31/spot-the-polarity-responder/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/31/spot-the-polarity-responder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael DeBusk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Left Field]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nlphilia.net/?p=433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is from Fail Blog, but I&#8217;m not so sure it isn&#8217;t a Win.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is from <a href="http://failblog.org">Fail Blog</a>, but I&#8217;m not so sure it isn&#8217;t a Win.<br />
<a href="http://failblog.org/2010/01/27/family-photo-fail/"><img class="mine_3111076096" title="epic-fail-family-photo-fail" src="http://failblog.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/epic-fail-family-photo-fail.jpg" alt="epic fail pictures" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/31/spot-the-polarity-responder/" rel="bookmark">Spot the Polarity Responder</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://nlphilia.net">NLPhilia Blog</a> on 2010-01-31 (Sunday).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/31/spot-the-polarity-responder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To a Thesaurus</title>
		<link>http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/20/to-a-thesaurus/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/20/to-a-thesaurus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael DeBusk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Left Field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linguistic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nlphilia.net/?p=431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone dear to me loves her thesaurus. When I read To A Thesaurus today on the Futility Closet blog, I thought of her. Then I thought of you guys! Here&#8217;s the first verse: O precious code, volume, tome, Book, writing, compilation, work, Attend the while I pen a pome, A jest, a jape, a quip, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone dear to me <em>loves</em> her thesaurus. When I read <a href="http://www.futilitycloset.com/2010/01/20/to-a-thesaurus/">To A Thesaurus</a> today on the Futility Closet blog, I thought of her. Then I thought of you guys! Here&#8217;s the first verse:</p>
<blockquote><p>O precious code, volume, tome,<br />
Book, writing, compilation, work,<br />
Attend the while I pen a pome,<br />
A jest, a jape, a quip, a quirk.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/20/to-a-thesaurus/" rel="bookmark">To a Thesaurus</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://nlphilia.net">NLPhilia Blog</a> on 2010-01-20 (Wednesday).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/20/to-a-thesaurus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aggression is In Your Face</title>
		<link>http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/16/aggression-is-in-your-face/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/16/aggression-is-in-your-face/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 03:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael DeBusk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Calibration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psych]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nlphilia.net/?p=428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve intuited for ages that faces reflect personalities, and that we can &#8220;tell just by looking at them&#8221; what a person is really like. Some new research is bearing out our intuition, at least in the domain of aggression: Volunteers viewed photographs of faces of men for whom aggressive behavior was previously assessed in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve intuited for ages that faces reflect personalities, and that we can &#8220;tell just by looking at them&#8221; what a person is really like. Some new research is bearing out our intuition, at least in the domain of aggression:</p>
<blockquote><p>Volunteers viewed photographs of faces of men for whom aggressive behavior was previously assessed in the lab. The volunteers rated how aggressive they thought each person was on a scale of one to seven after viewing each face for either 2000 milliseconds or 39 milliseconds.</p>
<p>The photographs were very revealing: Volunteers’ estimates of aggression correlated highly with the actual aggressive behavior of the faces viewed, even if they saw the picture for only 39 milliseconds.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://psychcentral.com/news/2009/11/02/facial-features-may-predict-volatility/9271.html"> Facial Features May Predict Volatility</a> is on Psych Central.</p>
<p><a href="http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/16/aggression-is-in-your-face/" rel="bookmark">Aggression is In Your Face</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://nlphilia.net">NLPhilia Blog</a> on 2010-01-16 (Saturday).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/16/aggression-is-in-your-face/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It Really Is Body Language</title>
		<link>http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/16/it-really-is-body-language/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/16/it-really-is-body-language/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 03:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael DeBusk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linguistic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nlphilia.net/?p=425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent article on the Lingformant blog points to some compelling new research on how we parse gestures: Your ability to make sense of Groucho’s words and Harpo’s pantomimes in an old Marx Brothers movie takes place in the same regions of your brain, says new research funded by the National Institute on Deafness and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://lingformant.vertebratesilence.com/2009/11/22/words-gestures-are-translated-by-same-brain-regions-says-new-research-findings-may-further-our-understanding-of-how-language-evolved/">recent article on the Lingformant blog</a> points to some compelling new research on how we parse gestures:</p>
<blockquote><p>Your ability to make sense of Groucho’s words and Harpo’s pantomimes in an old Marx Brothers movie takes place in the same regions of your brain, says new research funded by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), one of the National Institutes of Health.</p></blockquote>
<p>You can read the synopsis at <a href="http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/news/releases/09/11_09_09.htm">Words, Gestures Are Translated by Same Brain Regions</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/16/it-really-is-body-language/" rel="bookmark">It Really Is Body Language</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://nlphilia.net">NLPhilia Blog</a> on 2010-01-16 (Saturday).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nlphilia.net/2010/01/16/it-really-is-body-language/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
